Too Much Heaven: A Brief Look Back at 1979


With the new year starting, it is now forty years since 1979. Forty is a biblical number, which is fitting because 1979 was a year in which religious belief proved to be decisively political. Some of these events are still well remembered: Iran’s Islamic Revolution, the Christmas Eve invasion of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union, the Camp David Accords between Jimmy Carter, Anwar Sadat, and Menachem Begin. Other key events however are often forgotten, so that 1979 does not usually get the acknowledgment it deserves as being a year of unmatched religious and political action.

The year began with the resumption of diplomatic relations between the US and China, on New Year’s Day, ending three decades of formal estrangement between the two countries. This was followed by Deng Xiaoping visiting the White House at the end of the month, the first time a Communist leader of China had ever made such a trip. The new relationship had an immediate political impact when, on January 7th, the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia fell to the invading Communist Vietnamese. Five weeks after that, China invaded Vietnam, launching a short but brutal war against Vietnamese forces that had been fighting the US military only six years earlier.

According to Wikipedia: “On January 1, 1979, Chinese Vice-premier Deng Xiaoping visited the United States for the first time and told American president Jimmy Carter: “The little child [Vietnam] is getting naughty, it’s time he got spanked”. On February 15, the first day that China could have officially announced the termination of the 1950 Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance, Deng Xiaoping declared that China planned to conduct a limited attack on Vietnam. The reason cited for the attack was to support China’s ally, the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia, in addition to the mistreatment of Vietnam’s ethnic Chinese minority and the Vietnamese occupation of the Spratly Islands which were claimed by China. To prevent Soviet intervention on Vietnam’s behalf, Deng warned Moscow the next day that China was prepared for a full-scale war against the Soviet Union; in preparation for this conflict, China put all of its troops along the Sino-Soviet border on an emergency war alert, set up a new military command in Xinjiang, and even evacuated an estimated 300,000 civilians from the Sino-Soviet border. In addition, the bulk of China’s active forces (as many as one-and-a-half million troops) were stationed along China’s border with the Soviet Union”.

While the political importance of China and America re-establishing a relationship is obvious, its religious significance has tended to be overlooked. It has however helped lead to one of the largest increases in any religion in modern history: the re-adoption of Christianity by many tens of millions of Chinese since the 1970s. In 1979 China’s Three-Self Patriotic Movement church was legalized by the Chinese government. It and many other much smaller churches have been so successful in the decades since that today China and America have probably the two largest Protestant populations in the world. China’s overall Christian population is difficult to estimate, but 50-100 million is a common guess. (Chinese Christians or semi-Christians, notably Sun Yat-senChiang Kai-shek, and Hong Xiuquan, played an outsized role in the country’s history in the 19th and 20th centuries). 

Of course, it was in the Middle East where the biggest religious and political upheaval in 1979 took place. In Iran, the Ayatollah came to power on February 11th, the Shah having fled to Egypt three weeks earlier. In a foreshadowing of the larger hostage-taking that would occur in Iran at the end of the year, on February 14th the US ambassador was kidnapped and killed in Kabul, Afghanistan, while on the same day Iranian militants temporarily took control of the US embassy in Tehran, kidnapping a Marine there.

On March 26, the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty was signed. Israel returned the Sinai peninsula to Egypt as part of the deal, while Egypt became the first Arab state to recognize Israel. It has proved to be an extremely successful deal, in that Egypt and Israel had fought four wars against one another in the three decades preceding it, yet have not fought a single war against one another in the four decades since. The three men involved in the deal, Jimmy Carter, Anwar Sadat, and Menachem Begin, had been the most supportive of religion among the top political leaders of their respective countries, generations, and faiths.

The month ended on a less peaceful note in a different arena of religious and political conflict: Britain. On March 30 Airey Neave, the Tory party’s Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, was assassinated outside of the British Parliament by a car bomb planted by Irish militants. The assassination took place just two days after a no-confidence vote had brought down a Labour government. Margaret Thatcher was elected Britain’s first female prime minister a month later.

This assassination would be followed by an even larger attack later in the year. On August 27[1], the Provisional Irish Republican Army killed eighteen British soldiers with two roadside bombs in Northern Ireland, while on the same day killing Lord Mountbatten (an uncle of Prince Phillip, who had formerly been head of the Royal Navy, head of the Armed Forces, and Viceroy of India), his grandson, and two others by planting a bomb on his boat[2].

A month later, Ireland would host its own biggest religious event in decades, when the Pope visited the island. The Pope was welcomed by a crowd estimated to include 2.7 million people, nearly the entire population of the Republic of Ireland[3].

This however was not the Pope’s most important trip abroad in 1979, nor the one to attract the largest crowds. John Paul II, who had only become Pope at the end of 1978 (a rare “year of three popes”), was the first non-Italian Pope in 450 years. He was, even more importantly, Polish, at a time when Poland was the largest country in the Soviet-led Warsaw Pact. The Pope’s visit to Poland in June of 1979, often referred to as the nine days that changed the world, was the first trip by a Pope to a Communist country. It is thought to have played a meaningful role in the rise of the Polish Solidarity movement the following year – and the crackdown against it from 1981-1983 – and so in turn arguably helped end the Cold War.

The Pope’s influence also attracted enemies. When, at the end of 1979, the Pope was visiting Turkey, a young man named Mehmet Ali Agca, who was then beginning a life sentence in prison for killing the editor of a liberal Turkish newspaper earlier that year, escaped from jail and fled to Bulgaria. Two years later Agca shot the Pope in St. Peter’s Square. (Six months after that, martial law was declared in Poland, to restrain Solidarity). Given Bulgaria’s position in the Warsaw Pact and the role that Pope John Paull II played in Cold War politics, many people speculate that the Soviet Union was behind this attack in some way.

(Actually, Agca himself later claimed the KGB was involved. But he has a track record of making untrue, self-aggrandizing statements, so this does not prove anything decisively).

According to Acga, the Pope had orchestrated the siege of the Grand Mosque of Mecca, an event which was taking place when Acga made his jail break in November of 1979. This siege, which lasted for two weeks at the holiest site in Islam, was carried out by several hundred gunmen, perhaps as many as 600, led by a former Saudi National Guardsman, Juhayman al-Otaybi. Otaybi’s father and grandfather had fought against the Saudis fifty years prior in the Ikhwan revolt. His brother-in-law, Muḥammad bin abd Allah al-Qahtani, led the Grand Mosque siege alongside Otaybi, and was claimed to be the mahdi, a messianic figure.

Their attack took place on the first day of the new millennium of the Islamic calendar (1400 A.H.), toward the end of the annual Hajj pilgrimage. It is thought that there were initially 50,000 worshippers inside the building, but most were released early on during the siege. Saudi forces finally ended the siege after a number of poorly managed attempts and hundreds of deaths, by secretly enlisting the help of France, which sent three of its Special Forces soldiers to Mecca. They quickly converted to Islam in order to enter the holy city, then used gas to sedate many of the gunmen, who by then had taken refuge in the catacombs beneath the Mosque. The siege was finally ended by Saudi forces, and perhaps also Pakistani forces, storming the building.

The siege arguably had a major impact on Saudi culture  and foreign policy, and a direct legacy in future events such as the emergence of Al Qaeda. It is a sad, fascinating story worth reading about, one that is often forgotten due to the Iranian hostage crisis, which had begun several weeks earlier and was consuming much of America’s attention instead. The siege remains an overlooked or misunderstood subject within much of the Muslim world as well, in part because the Saudis have been somewhat successful at hushing it up.

At the time, the siege had a number of immediate consequences, owing partly to confusion as to who had orchestrated it. As we have already seen, Acga claimed the Pope was involved. Many others believed that the United States was behind the siege. (The newly victorious Ayatollah Khomeini, for example, said in a radio address that “It is not beyond guessing that this is the work of criminal American imperialism and international Zionism”). This resulted in the destruction of US embassies by mobs in Libya and Pakistan on December 3. Others believed Shia revolutionaries in Iran were behind the siege. This may have led to an uprising in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, where the country’s Shia minority population lives and most Saudi oil is located. People there had been attempting to celebrate Ashura on November 25, the major holiday for Shia that has been mostly prohibited in Saudi Arabia.

(Ashura was also prohibited in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Today the pilgrimage to Karbala in Iraq, which is held at the end of the 40 days of mourning that follow Ashura, is probably the largest annually held pilgrimage in the world, attracting approximately 20 million people per year).

A week later during that same Ashura, Iran held a referendum to ratify the constitution of its new Islamic Republic, which Khomeini had declared following his success in an earlier referendum held in March. The two referenda had large voter turnouts and overwhelming results in favour of Khomeini’s position.

Less than a year after the Eastern Province uprising in Saudi Arabia, a kind of mirror-image event occurred involving Iran’s Khuzestan province. Khuzestan is Iran’s most oil-rich region; it is located on the Gulf coast next to Iraq and Kuwait and is inhabited primarily by Iran’s Arabic-speaking minority population. In 1979 a Khuzestan uprising took place during the Iranian revolution. Then, in May of 1980, a six-day siege of Iran’s embassy in London was carried out by Iranian Arabs – trained and organized, allegedly, by Iraq – to publicize their demand of sovereignty for Khuzestan.

According to Wikipedia, “The Special Air Service (SAS), a special forces regiment of the British Army, initiated ‘Operation Nimrod’ to rescue the remaining hostages, abseiling from the roof and forcing entry through the windows….The operation brought the SAS to the public eye for the first time and bolstered the reputation of Thatcher’s government…The SAS raid, televised live on a bank holiday evening, became a defining moment in British history and proved a career boost for several journalists…”

This is not to be confused with the much longer US embassy hostage-taking, in and by Iran, which was still going on at the same time. The famous, failed Delta Force and CIA rescue attempt ordered by Jimmy Carter had taken place only ten days before the SAS’ mission in London.

Shia-Sunni and Arab-Persian political relationships were also deteriorating elsewhere in the Gulf region during 1979, part of the process that helped lead to the most deadly war in the recent history of the region, the Iran-Iraq War, which began with Iraq’s invasion of Khuzestan on September 22, 1980.

At the start of 1979, Iraq and Syria had been discussing the possibility of unifying their armed forces and merging into a single state[6], to counter Egypt’s new relationship with the US and Israel. The Shia Islamic revolution in Iran however created the possibility of a closer relationship between Iran and Syria. Syria’s government, led by Hafez al-Assad and the country’s minority Allawite (a branch of Shia Islam, sort of) coastal elite, was at the time fighting Sunni groups such as the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. Syria also had interests in the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990), a religious sectarian war in which Shia forces – a few years later emerging as the Party of God, Hezzbolah – were being energized by the Iranian revolution as well as by Israel’s invasion and subsequent withdrawal from Shia-inhabited South Lebanon in 1978.

In Iraq the reverse situation existed. The Iranian revolution frightened Iraq’s Sunni elite, in part because a majority of Iraq’s population were disenfranchised Shia. There had already been an unsuccessful uprising by Shia in Iraq in 1977, as well as an Iraqi Kurdish uprising in 1974-1975, which took place during an earlier, smaller Iran-Iraq War. This was followed by larger Shia uprisings in Iraq during 1979, triggered by the Iranian revolution. These may have played a role in leading Saddam Hussein, then the vice president of Iraq, to replace his elder cousin Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr, the president since 1968, with al-Bakr’s resignation on July 16, 1979.

A week later Saddam carried out his infamous public purge of Iraqi politicians, claiming they had been plotting with Syria to overthrow the government of Iraq. The following April, he ordered the execution of Iraq’s Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Baqir al Sadr (whose posthumous son-in-law, the Shia cleric Muqtada al Sadr, is today arguably the most influential politician in Iraq), along with the Grand Ayatollah’s sister Amina, before beginning an eight-year war against the ayatollahs in Iran in the fall.

(Muqtada al Sadr’s father, the Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Muhammad-Sadiq al-Sadr, was also assassinated by the Hussein regime, in 1999. And Musa al Sadr, another highly prominent member of the extended Sadr family, who founded the Shia Amal movement and militia in Lebanon, disappeared in 1978. It is thought that Muammar Gaddafi may have had him killed).

Several weeks before Saddam’s coup, the Aleppo Artillery School massacre took place, one of the key events in a six-year conflict between Syrian Sunni Islamists and Hafez-al Assad’s government. This conflict intensified in November 1979 (the same month as the Siege of Grand Mosque in Mecca), with the arrest of Shaykh Zain al-Din Khairalla,”a leading voice amongst Islamists and a regular leader of Friday prayers in the Great Mosque of Aleppo”. This led to the Siege of Aleppo in 1980 and Hama massacre in 1982, in which several thousand or tens of thousands of people were killed (depending on which sources you believe). It may have also led, a generation later, to the Syrian civil war’s especially tragic war zones in Aleppo and the Hama-Homs region  — and to 52 years now of rule by the Assad dynasty.

1979 was also the year in which Israel first attempted to prevent a rival country, Iraq, from developing nuclear power. In April, in southern France, Israeli agents used explosives to sabotage a reactor that was about to be shipped to Iraq. A little over a year later, in Paris, they assassinated an Egyptian scientist who was leading Iraq’s nuclear programme. Several months after that, in September 1980, Israel assisted the Iranian air force in its partially successful attempt to destroy Iraq’s nuclear reactor near Baghdad during the second week of the Iran-Iraq War. Finally, Israel attacked the Iraqi reactor directly in 1981.

Iran too carried out a significant assassination in Paris in December 1979, killing Shahriar Shafiq, a son of the Shah’s twin sister. Shafiq had been the highest-ranking royal in the Iran military, and the last to leave Iran during the revolution. In Paris in 1980, the Iranians also attempted to kill Shapour Bakhtiar, the last pre-revolutionary prime minister of Iran. He had been an opponent both of the Shah’s regime and of Khomeini. That attempt was a failure, but they later did assassinate him in Paris in 1991.

The year ended with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan on Christmas Eve [7]. Two days into the war the Soviets killed their former ally, Communist Afghan President Hafizulla Amin [8], who had come to power following a revolution and coup in 1978 (along with Babrak Karmal and Nur Muhammad Taraki; Taraki was overthrown by Amin three months before the Soviet invasion, and assassinated). US president Jimmy Carter then signed the order for the CIA to provide lethal aid to the Afghan mujahedeen. Carter had already signed off on providing financial aid to anti-Soviet factions in Afghanistan earlier in the year.

Most of this aid was facilitated by the Pakistani regime of general Zia ul Haq, who had come to power in a coup at the end of 1977, and who had briefly strained relations with the US by overseeing the execution by hanging of Pakistan’s previous leader Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in April 1979. (Bhutto’s daughter Benazir and son-in-law Asif Ali Zardari later became Pakistani leaders as well; Benazir was assassinated in 2007). More than any other politician, Zia would be responsible for transforming the Pakistani state into a theocratic government.

The decade-long resistance of the mujahedeen against the Soviets and their allies would result in the deaths of perhaps 500,000-2 million people, including 15,000-25,000 Soviet soldiers. For comparison, Soviet forces suffered perhaps only 1000-2000 deaths fighting abroad in the post-WW2 decades preceding the Afghan war (most in the 1950s in Korea and Hungary).

Thus it can be seen that 1979 was also a turning point in the extremely violent Cold War. From a time of “national malaise” in the US (to reference the famous speech by Carter that year[9]), which was dealing with an energy crisis, a hostage crisis, and recent memories of Vietnam[10], 1979 would set in motion forces that would lead to a US victory over the Soviet Union ten years later. But then, it would also lead the US to its wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, at the start of another new millennium.

1979 was significant because of its mix of religion and politics, but that mix was obviously was not new at the time, and has not gone away since. What may be more relevant is that the events of 1979 helped to shape the views of a generation of people who, today having reached positions of seniority, can now shape events themselves[11]. Perhaps this has contributed to the fact that American relationships with Iran and Russia remain hostile just like they were in 1979, while American relationships with countries like China, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt remain cooperative just like they were in 1979. True, there are signs that some of these relationships may be beginning to change. But for today at least, 1979 remains a guide worth remembering.

Notes:

[1]This attack took place just as a public debate over whether or not it was appropriate to satirize religion was taking place in Britain, as ten days earlier the Monty Python movie The Life of Brian was released. The movie was banned in the Republic of Ireland until 1987.

[2]Another prominent figure assassinated in 1979 was Park Chung-hee, who had been the president of South Korea since 1963, first coming to power in a military coup in 1961. He was shot by his own close friend, the head of Korea’s intelligence service. This in turn led to a series of coups in South Korea in 1979 and 1980. Park’s daughter was recently president from 2013 to 2017, but was then impeached, and served four years in prison on corruption charges.

[3]Two weeks before the Pope’s visit, Ireland passed the Health Act, which legalized the selling of contraception for the purposes of family planning. In China, meanwhile, 1979 was the year the one-child policy was implemented. (This was preceded, in China, by a plummeting birth rate during the 1970s, and, in India, by a mass forced sterilization campaign of poor men during the 1970s).

[4] A second serious attempt on the Pope’s life took place the following year (1982), at a pilgrimage to Fatima, Portugal, which he was making to give thanks for surviving Acga’s attack. There the Pope was stabbed by a traditionalist Catholic, Spanish priest with the bayonet of a rifle. The priest accused the Pope of being a Communist agent (somewhat ironic, considering that many accused Acga of the same). The Pope survived both attacks, and went on to have the longest papal tenure (1978-2005) of any pontiff other than Pius IX (1846-1878).

[5] According to one source: “Saudi intelligence services apparently had no accurate blueprints of the Grand Mosque, and knew nothing of the underground labyrinth where many of the militants took shelter; they eventually received plans to the site from Osama bin Laden’s older brother…While the official death toll was 127 soldiers, 117 militants, and an unknown number of civilians, independent observers reported a toll of ‘well over 1,000 lives.’ At least two-thirds of those killed in the siege were Iranians. The surviving insurgents were captured by Saudi authorities and all of the surviving male radicals were beheaded.” (I don’t how accurate these figures are, particularly regarding the number of the siege’s Iranian casualties. The details of the whole affair remain relatively uncertain).

[More recently, the Saudi Binladen Group was banned from construction work in Mecca following by far the deadliest crane collapse in history, at the Grand Mosque on (coincidentally) September 11, 2015, ten days before the Hajj, which resulted in more than 100 deaths, nearly all of whom were foreign workers from South Asia or Egypt. The Hajj itself then ended up being far more deadly still, as more than 2400 pilgrims attending (nearly 500 from Iran) were killed in history’s worst stampede – beating out several other morbid records set during previous modern Hajjes – due to horrendous crowd-management planning. This occurred less than a year into Salman’s kingship, and during the 2015 oil crash]

[6]Like Syria and Egypt had done from 1958 to 1961.

[7]Though not in Orthodox countries like Russia, where Christmas is on January 7. A decade later, on December 25, 1989, Nicolae Ceaușescu and his wife Elena were tried and executed in Romania, about a month after the Berlin Wall was torn down.

[8]He was not the only Amin to be ousted from power in 1979. Uganda’s Idi Amin (no relation) was removed too, by an invading Tanzanian army.

[9]Though Carter never actually used the word malaise in the “malaise speech”.

[10]At the 1979 Academy Awards, The Deer Hunter won Best Picture while Jon Voight and Jane Fonda won Best Actor and Best Actress for Coming Home. Both were films about Vietnam. Apocalypse Now then similarly went on to win the top prize at the Cannes Film Festival in 1979 (but was snubbed in favour of Kramer vs Kramer at the Oscars in 1980).

[11]In 1979, Donald Trump started building Trump Tower. Bill Clinton was elected governor of Arkansas at the age of 31. An 18-year-old Barack Obama moved to the US mainland to attend a liberal arts college in Los Angeles. Xi Jinping finished his degree in chemical engineering, as a “Worker-Peasant-Soldier student” in Beijing. Angela Merkel too was becoming a chemist in a Communist state, having finished her physics degree at the end of 1978 in Berlin. Mikhail Gorbachev was promoted in November 1978, moving to Moscow from Stavropol (near the Caucuses) to become the Party’s youngest Central Committee member, at the age of 49. Shinzo Abe finished his degree at the University of Southern California in 1979. Narendra Modi graduated from the University of Delhi in 1978 and began working for the Hindu nationalist paramilitary organization, the RSS, in 1979. Jeremy Corbyn entered politics as a local councillor in 1979; Boris Johnson, who recently beat Corbyn with the biggest vote share in any UK election since 1979, was (no surprises here) at Eton.

Additional notes:

  • In 1979, Mother Teresa was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
  • China has not really fought in a war since Vietnam in 1979
  • The Taiwan Relations Act was passed in the United States, and remains in effect today
  • From a recent article in Week in China magazine: “The handshake between Deng Xiaoping and Muhammad Ali in December 1979 was a ground-shaking moment in both sport and geopolitics. China had just reestablished diplomatic ties with the United States and the boxing superstar was visiting Beijing as a special envoy for then American leader Jimmy Carter. His job was to persuade the Chinese to skip the Moscow Olympics, which was scheduled for the following year. They did just that but sent a large delegation to the Los Angeles Games four years later – the first time for decades they had participated at the Olympics in a competitive and practical sense (a small squad of athletes made a symbolic appearance in Helsinki 1952). The message from Beijing seemed clear. China was turning away from the Soviet Union and more towards the US as it started to usher in a period of economic reforms and more openness to the outside world. Beijing even lifted a domestic ban on boxing as well.”
  • The other major area of political conflict, Cold War rivalry, and religious activity was Central America, where wars in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua were taking place around this time. A key event in the El Salvador civil war (1979-1992) was the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero, which took place while he was at mass in March 1980, a day after he had publicly asked Salvadoran soldiers not to carry out orders to kill civilians. In Nicaragua, meanwhile, where the Sandinistras overthrew the Somoza government in 1979, they did so with the support of the country’s Catholic clergy, an unusual – and short-lived – alliance between a left-wing revolutionary movement and the Church.
  • From Wikipedia: [Hezbollah leader Hassan] Nasrallah studied at the Shia seminary in the Beqaa Valley town of Baalbek. The school followed the teachings of Iraqi Shi’ite scholar Mohammad Baqir al-Sadr, who founded the Dawa movement in Najaf, Iraq, during the early 1960s. In 1976, at 16, Nasrallah traveled to Iraq where he was admitted into al-Sadr’s seminary in Najaf…. Nasrallah was expelled from Iraq, along with dozens of other Lebanese students in 1978. Al-Sadr was imprisoned, tortured, and brutally murdered. Nasrallah was forced to return to Lebanon in 1979, by that time having completed the first part of his study, as Saddam Hussein was expelling many Shias, including the future Iranian supreme leader, Ruhollah Khomeini, and also Abbas al-Musawi. Back in Lebanon, Nasrallah studied and taught at the school of Amal‘s leader Abbas al-Musawi, later being selected as Amal’s political delegate in Beqaa, and making him a member of the central political office. [Amal was founded by Musa al-Sadr, who was disappeared in 1978]. Around the same time, in 1980, Mohammad Al-Sadr was executed by Hussein”. The current Prime Minister of Iraq, Muhammad Shia’ al-Sudani, was ten years old in 1980 when his father and five other family members were executed by the Iraqi government for having been members of the Shia Islamic Dawa Party. Muqtada al-Sadr currently leads the Iraqi Shia Sadrist movement.
  • The Second Yemenite War was fought in 1979 between North Yemen and South Yemen, with various outside powers participating on each side. The war began following the assassinations, only two days apart, of the heads of states of both the North and South in July 1978. Ali Abdullah Saleh, who took over as president of North Yemen following the first of these assassinations, would later become the leader of a re-unified Yemen in 1990. Saleh would preside over a further civil war in 1994, and eventually be forced out of office in 2011 after the Arab Spring. He then became involved in yet another civil war, which began in 2014 and continues today. He was killed in the war at the end of 2017.
  • Yemen is thought to have had the highest fertility rate in the world in 1979, at nearly 9 children per mother on average. Today its fertility rate is below 3 children per mother, a lower figure than that of perhaps 40 other countries.
  • The 1970s was also the key decade for one of the major religious trends that has been taking place in the world in recent generations, namely the emergence of evangelicalism – and the relative decline in Catholicism – in Latin America, especially in Central America and Brazil.
  • In December 1978, a few months after Argentina hosted and won the World Cup, Argentine military forces attempted to land on three remote, disputed islands Argentina shares with Chile at the southern tip of South America, but had to call off the landing because of bad weather. The Pope was then brought in to resolve the dispute, which was only successfully accomplished after Argentina’s military government lost power following its Falklands War with Britain in 1982 (which was fought over similarly southerly islands). As a result of this dispute, Chile supported Britain in the Falklands War. The military dictatorship in Argentina lasted from 1976 to 1983.
  • The Three Mile Island nuclear accident, the most significant in US history, occurred in March, 1979 (twelve days after the movie The China Syndrome was released). Later, in July, according to Wikipedia: “The largest release of radioactive material in U.S. history, the Church Rock uranium mill spill, took place near Church Rock, New Mexico when a dam was breached, releasing the contents of a disposal pond maintained by United Nuclear Corporation….. The spill contaminated the water supply of much of McKinley County, New Mexico and Navajo County, Arizona within the Navajo Nation territory.”
  • 1979 may have been the peak year for energy price inflation in the United States
  • In India, Indira Gandhi was voted out of office in 1977 in the aftermath of the 1975-1977 Emergency, the first time a leader of the country’s Congress Party had failed to become prime minister. The incoming government tried to have Indira arrested and expelled from parliament, but in the subsequent election in 1980 she returned to power for a third time. That was the last of her election wins: she was assassinated in 1984 by two of her Punjabi Sikh bodyguards, after having ordered Operation Blue Star at the Golden Temple, the holiest Sikh site. Her son Rajiv took over from her and became PM in 1984 – an election season marked by large-scale anti-Sikh pogroms – but was assassinated as well, in a suicide bombing carried out by a member of the Tamil Tigers in 1991 (with assistance from two leaders of the Sikh Khalistan movement).
  • In Turkey, according to an article in New Lines Magazine, “In 1980, after a decade of near civil war between left and right, the military carried out a violent coup and propagated the Turkish-Islamic Synthesis as a means of uniting the country. Three years later, the former World Bank economist and conservative, Turgut Ozal, became prime minister. This was the moment that neo-Ottomanism went from the mosque and the tea house to the government. Ozal’s Motherland Party (ANAP) represented — as Ozturk explains — the “merger of all the different colours of Turkey’s right-wing political tradition: conservatives, nationalists, and Islamists.”
  • The group that Acga, and his co-conspirators such as Oral Celik, associated themselves with was called the Grey Wolves. It was a nationalist and pan-Turkist paramilitary organization that carried out attacks such as that which killed more than 100 Alevis (a mystical religious minority group) in December 1978. According to Wikipedia, “they are also alleged to have been behind the Taksim Square massacre in May 1977 [which killed an estimated 30-40 left-wing demonstrators] and to have played a role in the Kurdish-Turkish conflict from 1978 onwards”. The Grey Wolve’s leader, Abdullah Catli, might have also been involved in Acga and Celik’s murder of Abdi İpekçi, which landed Acga in jail, and perhaps even in Acga’s attempt on the Pope’s life in 1981.
  • By coincidence, that murder of Abdi Ipekci took place on the same day that Khomenei returned to Iran after 15 years in exile in Turkey, Iraq, and (after 1978) France, February 1, 1979. And when Acga fled from prison later that year he escaped first to Iran, before ending up in Bulgaria
  • All of the longest lasting presidencies in the world today began in 1979, in  Africa: Angola’s Jose Eduardo dos Santos (who finally left office in 2017), Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo of Equatorial Guinea (still in power), and Denis Sassou Nguesso of the Republic of the Congo (although with a brief stint out of office from 1993-1997)
  • In a sense, all three of the key Abrahamic faiths were deployed in the Cold War in 1979: (Sunni) Islam in Afghanistan, (Catholic) Christianity in Poland, and the campaign to allow Jewish refuseniksmost famously Anatoly Sharansky, to emigrate from the Soviet Union. [Sharansky, like the plurality of emigrating Soviet Jews, came from Ukraine; he was born in Stalino, which was renamed Donetsk in 1961 and annexed to Russia by Vladimir Putin this past year].
  • In neighbouring Bahrain, just off the coast of the Saudi Eastern Province’s capital city and major oil fields, Iran supported a coup attempt by the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain in 1981. Iran had long claimed Bahrain as a historical province of Iran, and Bahrain’s small population – only 350,000 in 1979 – was largely Shia, but ruled over by a Sunni monarchy. The coup attempted to place an Iraqi Shia ayatollah who was exiled in Iran, Hadi al Modarresi, in power in Bahrain. (Modarresi is still around today, in Iraq; he recently claimed Covid-19 is a divine punishment for Chinese dietary habits and mistreatment of Uighur Muslims. (Muqtada al Sadr, in contrast, blamed Covid on same-sex marriage legislation in various countries). During the Arab Spring in 2011, Saudi forces crossed the causeway that links the Eastern Province to Bahrain, to assist the Bahraini monarchy to suppress protests.
  • In Israel, Menachem Begin’s Likud party came to power in 1977, ending three decades in office by leftist parties, which had governed since the country’s independence from Britain in 1948. Likud has been in power for roughly 28 of the 45 years since then, and right-wing parties generally have been in power for 35 of those years. Likud’s current leader [and now PM once again, in 2022], Benjamin Netanyahu, was Prime Minister for 15 years, from 1996-1999 and then from 2009-2021, narrowly beating David Ben Gurion’s previous record as the longest-serving Israeli leader. In 1979 Netanyahu was working at Bain Capital in the US, where he was a friend of Mitt Romney. Three years earlier, in 1976, when Netanyahu was in his final year as a student at MIT,  Netanyahu’s older brother Yonatan led the raid on Entebbe in Idi Amin’s Uganda (a regime which lasted until 1979), and was the only one of the 100 Israeli commandos involved who was killed.
  • Anwar Sadat, who, after ordering the surprise invasion of Israel on Yom Kippur (and Ramadan) in 1973, broke ground visiting Jerusalem in 1977 (just after Likud came to power) and signed the peace accords in 1978 and 1979, was assassinated in 1981, at an annual victory parade celebrating Egypt’s invasion of the Sinai in that earlier 1973 war. Hosni Mubarak, who as vice-president was sitting next to Sadat during the assassination, then become Egypt’s leader for the following three decades. Mubarak’s (brief) successor, Mohammad Morsi, joined the Muslim Brotherhood in 1979. His current successor, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, first became a military officer in 1977, just like Mubarak, Sadat, and Sadat’s predecessor Gamal Abdel Nasser had all been.
  • In the roundup of hundreds of suspected religious extremists or alleged enemies of the state that followed Sadat’s assassination, one of the men arrested was a recent medical school graduate and Muslim Brotherhood member, Ayman al-Zawahiri, who had that same year worked at a Red Crescent hospital treating refugees in the border areas of north-west Pakistan. He would later become second to Osama Bin Laden in Al Qaeda. It is not clear whether or not he is still alive, but he would be 70 years old now if he is.
  • Al-Zawahiri was also a supporter of the “Blind Sheik”, Omar Abdel-Rahman, who had issued a fatwa sanctioning Sadat’s murder and who, like Zawahiri, would be jailed for three years following the assassination. Abdel-Rahman would later be involved in attacks such as the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing, the massacre of dozens of tourists visiting Luxor in 1997, the murder of extremist Israeli politician and rabbi Meir Kahane in New York City in 1990, and the 1994 attack on Egypt’s most famous writer, Naguib Mafouz (for his allegorical novel about Abrahamic religions and modernity, Children of Gabalawi).
  • Other events, notably the Siege of the Grand Mosque in Mecca in 1979, in which perhaps 1000 people were killed, were also fundamental to the later creation of Al Qaeda. Arguably, the 9-11 attacks were themselves prefigured in the 1970s. In September 1970, four airplanes in Europe were hijacked on the same day by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, with three flown to Jordan and the fourth, an El Al plane, unsuccessfully hijacked as the pilot threw the plane into a nosedive. A day later a fifth plane was hijacked and flown to Jordan, the non-Jewish hostages on the planes were released while the Jewish hostages were kept imprisoned, and the Black September war began between the Jordanian government and militants from the Palestinian Liberation Organization (the latter backed to a certain extent by the Syrian government, which invaded northern Jordan during that brief conflict).
  • In 1979, the Mossad assassinated the alleged organizer of the militant group Black September, Ali Hassan Salameh (the “Red Prince”), who was claimed to be behind attacks such as those at the Munich Olympics in 1972 and the assassination of Jordanian Prime Minister Wasfi Tal (who had presided over the Black September War) in 1971.
  • From Wikipedia: “Israel invaded Lebanon again in 1982 in alliance with the major Lebanese Christian militias of the Lebanese Forces and Kataeb Party and forcibly expelled the PLO… Israel withdrew from most of Lebanon in 1985, but kept control of a 19-kilometre security buffer zone, held with the aid of proxy militants in the South Lebanon Army(SLA).”  It held this territory until 2000.
  • The Sabra and Shatila massacres took place at this time, in 1982, two days after the assassination of newly elected Lebanese President Bachir Pierre Gemayel, a Christian. The massacres involved the killing of several hundred or several thousand civilians, mostly Palestinian refugees or Shia Lebanese, by a Christian Lebanese militia, backed by Israeli forces that were surrounding the area, in the neighbourhood of Sabra and refugee camp Shatila.
  • The following year, Israel’s Kahan Commission deemed that Israeli Defence Minister Ariel Sharon, among others, bore personal responsibility for the massacre. Wikipedia again: “Initially, Sharon refused to resign, and Prime Minister Menachem Begin refused to fire him. However, following a peace march against the government, as the marchers were dispersing, a grenade was thrown into the crowd, killing Emil Grunzweig, a reserve combat officer and peace activist, and wounding half a dozen others, including the son of the Interior Minister. Although Sharon resigned as Defence Minister, he remained in the Cabinet as a Minister without Portfolio. Years later, Sharon would be elected Israel’s Prime Minister [in 2001].”
  • In 2002, one of President Gemayel’s closest associates, militia commander and politician Elie Hobeika, who had been involved in carrying out the Sabra and Shatila massacre (and whose own fiancee and much of his family was killed in an earlier massacre, the Damour massacre, perpetrated by a Palestinian militia in 1976; which was itself a response to still earlier massacres of Palestinians) was assassinated by a car bomb in Beirut, not long before he was scheduled to testify in a Belgian court about the Sabra and Shatila massacres.  
  • Less comedic than The Life of Brian, the film Khirbet Khizeh was also set in the Holy Land, and was also prevented from being shown. It was cancelled immediately before it had been scheduled to air on Israeli television, in February of 1978. Israel’s Ministry of Education and Culture prevented it from being shown – though the novella it was adapted from had been part of the Israeli curriculum at the time – because it depicted Israeli mistreatment and ethnic cleansing of a Palestinian village during the 1948 war. The controversy this censorship caused within Israel was soon after overshadowed by the invasion of southern Lebanon by Israel in March, as well as by the Coastal Road massacre – still likely the deadliest ever attack by Palestinians against Israelis – which also took place in March. And then by the Camp David Accords which began in September 1978.
  • Rising ethnic and religious conflict in another part of the world at the end of the 1970s, namely in Sri Lanka between the predominantly Hindu Tamil and Buddhist Sinhalese, arguably led to the first post-WWII case of frequent suicide bombing, during the country’s long civil war that began in 1983. Suicide bombing had been extremely rare during the previous generation, but has been used with increasing frequency in the decades since. To this day Sri Lanka has experienced the most such attacks outside of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Two of these attacks, in 1996 and 1997, killed dozens of people in the World Trade Centre in Colombo, Sri Lanka’s tallest building – yet another prefiguring of the 9-11 attacks.
  • Around the same time, in Lebanon, the 1983 Beirut barracks truck bombing, killing 241 American and 58 French military personnel, and 6 civilians, was also a key event in the reemergence of politically and religiously motivated suicide attacks, and might have contributed to the view within Al Qaeda that Western militaries might retreat from the region if aggressively attacked. 
  • Of the 19 hijackers involved in 9-11, 11 were born between 1977-1981 and all between 1968-1981.
  • Having survived the attempts on his life in 1981 and 1982, Pope John Paul II later also avoided the 1995 Bojinka plot, a proto-Septemer 11 attack that came somewhat close to being carried out by Khalid Sheik Mohammad’s nephew Ramzi Youssef, in which the Pope would have been assassinated in the Philippines, 11 American airliners flying out of Asia would have been destroyed by concealed time bombs, and a hijacked or rented airplane in the US might have been crashed into the CIA headquarters or a skyscraper.
  • In Iraqi Kurdistan, Masoud Barzani became the head of the Kurdish Democratic Party in 1979 upon the death of his father, and survived an assassination attempt in Vienna that year. Among other things, he would later be a central figure in the Iraqi Kurdish secession referendum in 2017.
  • Syria, despite being a fellow Arab country and Ba’athist regime, backed Iran in the Iran-Iraq War, blocking Iraq from using its most important oil pipeline running through Syria to the Mediterranean. Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Arab monarchies, however, supported Iraq financially, and at times so too did outside powers such as the US, France, and even the Soviet Union.
  • Iran’s Khuzestan province is on the Mesopotamian, Gulf-Arab side of the Zagros mountain range, which runs along the Iran-Iraq border in every place except for Khuzestan. In this way too Khuzestan is arguably a mirror of Saudi Arabia’s oil-rich Shia-inhabited Eastern Province, which is separated from the majority of Saudi Arabia’s population by the Arabian desert. With the exception of Riyadh, most Saudi citizens live in the country’s far west or south-west, far from the Gulf coast.
  • The Vela incident also occurred in 1979, which might have involved South Africa, or  perhaps other countries such as Israel, Pakistan, India, or France, testing nuclear weapons.
  • In the US, Baptist minister Jerry Fallwell Sr. founded the Moral Majority in 1979, a “key step in the formation of the New Christian Right” (according to Wikipedia).
  • The “Satanic Panic” also began in the United States in 1979, following a series of three murders that took place in Fall River, Massachusetts
  • In the Mormon church, the Revelation on Priesthood, announced in October 1978,
    “reversed a long-standing policy excluding men of black African descent from the priesthood”
  • Cult activity in the United States also reached one of its high points in the late 1970s.
    The main example of this is the “Jonestown massacre” in Guyana in November 1978, involving Jim Jones’ San Fransisco-based People’s Temple, in which over 900 people  were either killed or committed suicide with poison and American Congressman Leo Ryan was murdered.  But there were other prominent cases too, such as the Rajneesh movement (“Rajneeshpuram” was founded in Oregon in 1981), or the Nation of Yahweh, founded by Hulon Mitchell Jr., aka Yahweh ben Yahweh, in Florida in 1979. The Nation of Islam also experienced a revival of sorts at the end of the 1970s, under the newfound leadership of Louis Farrakhan.
  • “In 1978, the U.S. Congress asked President Jimmy Carter to designate [Menachem Mendel] Schneerson‘s birthday as the national Education Day U.S. It has been since commemorated as Education and Sharing Day.” Schneerson is considered a messiah by at least several thousand Jews in the Chabad movement worldwide.
  • There was pushback against cult activity in these years too, notably the 1978-1979 lawsuit United States v. Mary Sue Hubbard et al., which ended in convictions of high-ranking members of the Church of Scientology, and the 1978-1979 Congressional investigation of The Unification Church of the United States. [The Unification Church recently gained attention for its possible, indirect role in motivating Shinzo Abe’s assassin in 2022]. 
  • The late 1970s was an important time for the modern youth religions of superheroes, sci-fi-fantasy stories, and sports superstars. 1977-1983 was Star Wars. 1977-1982 was Spielberg’s Raiders of the Lost Ark, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and E.T.: the Extraterrestrial. 1978 was the first big superhero movie, Superman. (Marlon Brando played his heavenly father Jor-El, a year before playing Kurtz in Apocalypse Now). 1979 was Ridley Scott’s Alien (followed up by Blade Runner in 1982) and the first Star Trek movie, and the publication of Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. 1977-1981 was Steven King’s The Shining (both the book and the movie), the The Stand, and the beginning of the The Dark Tower series. 1977-1980 was the first trilogy of Tolkien film adaptations, and 1979 was the publication of Tolkien’s posthumous mythological cycle, The Silmarillion.
  • On at least one occasion, this sci-fi film wave got closely mixed up with international politics. During the Iranian hostage crisis in 1979 (as Ben Affleck’s Argo later made famous) a CIA operative made use of producer Berry Geller’s 1978 purchase of the rights to Roger Zelazny’s sci-fi novel “Lord of Light” – about human spacefarers who turn themselves into a sort of Hindu pantheon of gods on an alien planet –  to set up a fake Hollywood studio in order to pretend to scout locations for a movie in Iran, and so rescue several escaped hostages who had been hiding out in the Canadian embassy. (In 1978, before the Iranian Revolution had happened, Geller had been hoping to turn the film’s hypothetical production site into an ambitiously imagined theme park, Science Fiction Land, once filming was complete, to help pay for the costs of making the film). The sci fi phenomenon of the preceding years was the reason why such a crazy-sounding plan actually seemed credible.
  • In sports, 1979 was the rookie year of Wayne Gretzky, Magic Johnson and Larry Bird, and Rickey Henderson.  It was also the first year the NBA added a three-point line, and ESPN was founded. (Ditto CSPAN and, in 1980, CNN, the first 24-hour news channel). In boxing, it was the last year in which Muhammad Ali held a championship belt – he won it at the end of 1978 in what was, at the time, the highest-attendance boxing match in history. Sylvester Stallone, among others, was sitting ringside at that match; 1979 was also the year Rocky Balboa won his first fictional championship belt. (Raging Bull came out the following year, 1980).
  • An American religion that is perhaps even bigger than sports or superheroes is that of pickup trucks and SUVs. The Ford F-150 has been the best selling vehicle in the United States since 1981, and the best selling pickup truck since 1977. This was also the peak period for road fatalities in the US, at about 50,000 per year on average during the late 1970s.
  • In other TV news, 1979 saw the first ever biopic of Elvis (starring Kurt Russel) – 43 million Americans watched live. It also saw the last ever episode of All in the Family – 40 million watched live.
  • In Canada, Pierre Trudeau was Liberal prime minister from 1968-1979 and again from 1980-1984, but was briefly out of power in 1979 after losing an election to the Conservative’s Joe Clark, who formed a minority government with the help of the Social Credit Party‘s seats in Quebec (the last time the Social Credits ever won a seat in parliament). All the provinces west of Quebec voted for Clark, but Quebec went heavily for Trudeau. The following year, the first referendum on Quebec sovereignty was held, initiated by the Parti Quebecois, which had won its first Quebec premiership in 1976. It voted roughly 60-40 “No” to the confusingly worded question the referendum asked its voters. A second referendum was held in 1995, with a much closer 50.6%-to-49.4% result.
  • In Scotland and in Wales referenda were similarly held in 1979, on the question of devolution to a Scottish Assembly and a Welsh Assembly, respectively. The Welsh were a strong No (80%-20%, roughly); the Scots were a slim Yes (51.6%-48.4%), but because those Yes voters only accounted for 32.9% of total registered voters in Scotland, less than the 40% threshold the referendum rules required, devolution was not achieved. A Scottish Parliament and a Welsh Parliament were not created until 1999, following second referenda in Scotland and Wales in 1997 (this time with a slim Yes for Wales and a big Yes for Scotland).
  • Joe Biden became a senator in 1973, two weeks after his wife and daughter were killed in a car crash. (He was then the sixth-youngest-ever senator. Now he is the oldest ever president). According to Wikipedia: “In his first decade in the Senate, Biden focused on arms control. After Congress failed to ratify the SALT II Treaty signed in 1979 by Soviet general secretary Leonid Brezhnev and President Jimmy Carter, Biden met with Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko to communicate American concerns and secured changes that addressed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s objections. When the Reagan administration wanted to interpret the 1972 SALT I treaty loosely to allow development of the Strategic Defense Initiative (aka Star Wars), Biden argued for strict adherence to the treaty. He received considerable attention when he excoriated Secretary of State George Shultz at a Senate hearing for the Reagan administration’s support of South Africa despite its continued policy of apartheid“.

The Age Dependency Ratio – A Brief Demographic Overview of the World

2008 was as significant a year from a demographic perspective as it was from a financial one. In 2008 the world’s age dependency ratio —  the number of people who are either younger than 15 or older than 65, relative to the number of people aged 15-65 — reached its lowest ever point. From a peak of approximately 0.77-to-1 in 1967, the world’s age dependency ratio fell to 0.54-to-1 in 2008, a level it has remained at every year in the decade since. (Or, to put it another way, which might be more intuitive, the percentage of the world’s population that is 15-65 years old reached its highest point in 2008 – 65 percent – and remains there today). This record low is not likely to be broken any time soon. The United Nations predicts that the dependency ratio will rise again during the decades ahead, albeit gradually, as more Baby Boomers reach 65 years old and as birth rates continue to fall worldwide.

The age dependency ratio is a useful, though obviously imperfect, measure of economic potential. The higher a country’s dependency ratio, the heavier the economic burden (to put it crudely) its working-age population may need to bear. The country with the highest dependency ratio in the world, Niger, with a ratio of 1.12, has 1.12 children or seniors (mostly children, in Niger’s case) for every 15-65-year-old adult. The country with the lowest dependency ratio, South Korea, with a ratio of 0.38, has nearly three adults for every one child or senior citizen. The small Gulf Arab monarchies have even lower ratios than that – the United Arab Emirates’ is just 0.18 – but only because they have so many temporary foreign workers (mostly men) living within their borders.

Picture4
Middle-income countries have had their age dependency ratios fall quickly during the past generation

It is not surprising that a lower dependency ratio has tended to correlate with economic success. Not only is a country with fewer dependents more able to invest its time and money into increasing its productivity, but productive countries also tend to have low birth rates, which help keep dependency levels low in the short-term (though not, of course, in the long term; fewer kids eventually means fewer adults, absent immigration). As such, a low dependency ratio can be both a cause and an effect of economic growth. Even the oldest country in the world, Japan, only has a dependency ratio of 0.66, much lower than the dependency ratios of the young countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Picture5
Japan’s dependency burden began rising around 1990, while China’s only began rising around 2010. But even today, elderly Japan still has a lower dependency ratio than China did during the Mao era, when the Chinese population was young.

In recent history, the correlation between economic growth and age dependency can be seen most clearly in East Asia. China’s rapid economic growth has tracked its dependency ratio’s steep fall, while Japan’s stalled economic growth has tracked its own dependency ratio’s rise. China’s dependency ratio, which is today the lowest in the world apart from South Korea (not counting city-states or the Gulf Arab monarchies), was almost twice as high a generation ago, and only fell below the US’s around 1990.

That same year, Japan’s age dependency ratio fell below that of a newly reunified Germany to become the lowest in the world, apart from Singapore or Hong Kong. An aging population has since made Japan’s dependency ratio become by far the highest in the developed world, however. Japan’s ratio has also risen higher than those of many developing nations in recent years, even than some of the world’s poorest nations outside of Sub-Saharan Africa, such as Haiti:

Picture6

Outside Japan, East Asia now has the lowest dependency ratios of any region, by far. Not only China and South Korea but also Thailand, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Malaysia, and even North Korea all have ratios between 0.38-0.44, the lowest in the world anywhere outside of the Persian Gulf. Indonesia’s dependency ratio too, at 0.48, is now lower than those of most countries in the world. And the Philippines, the major outlier in the region with a dependency ratio of 0.57, no longer has a high ratio by global standards either.

This trend, however, is finally beginning to change. China’s ratio has begun to rise since 2010, prompting many to worry that the country “will become old before it becomes rich”. (China’s aging may actually be taking place much more rapidly than its official statistics have suggested). The dependency ratios of Vietnam, Thailand, and South Korea have also begun rising during the past several years. And Japan’s already high dependency ratio will keep rising quickly unless it is able to continue to increase its very low immigration rate.

Age dependency ratios by region: Sub-Saharan Africa’s remains the highest by far; East Asia’s remains the lowest, but is converging with other regions’

The years 2008-2010, in addition to being when the global dependency ratio and the Chinese dependency ratio both reached their lowest levels, was also when the European Union’s dependency ratio rose higher than that of the US, for the first time since 1984. The EU’s dependency burden has continued to rise relative to the US in the decade since, a fact that has perhaps contributed, at least to a minor extent, to the US’s stronger economic performance during this period.

Indeed, at the risk of attributing far more significance to the age dependency ratio than is justified, I will also point out the fact that countries in Central Europe have of late enjoyed a much lower ratio and a much stronger economic performance than has the EU as a whole. Similarly, Canada had the lowest dependency ratio and one of the stronger economies among rich Western nations during the years before oil prices fell in 2015. Dependency burdens in Canada and Central Europe were particularly low during the financial crisis, relative to those of the United States or the European Union as a whole:

Picture8

Another intriguing case is Italy, which has a ratio that has been rising at a fast pace since 2010, at the same time as its economy has become perhaps the primary point of concern in European politics. A similar trend has existed throughout Southern Europe, with the ratios of Greece, Spain, and France reaching high levels in the years after 2010. Although it is actually France which has the highest dependency ratio of these countries, a result of its having a relatively large number of children compared to other European countries, it is Italy which has their highest old age dependency ratio (population older than 65, relative to population 15-65):

Picture9
Above is an Old Age Dependency Ratio chart. Italy has the highest Old Age Dependency Ratio in western Europe, but several countries in eastern Europe (which are not shown on this chart) are just as high — and Japan is highest of all, by a significant margin. In Japan, there are now only two 15-65-year-old adults for every one senior citizen, whereas even in Italy the ratio of 15-65-year-old adults to seniors is still roughly 2.75-to-1.

In contrast, Japan, South Korea, Italy, Germany, Portugal, and several other European countries are more or less tied for having the lowest “Youth Dependency Ratioin the world (as usual, with the exception of Gulf Arab mini-monarchies, Hong Kong, and Singapore, which have even lower ratios). They each have only about one-fifth the number of kids below 15 years old as adults between the ages of 15-65. On the opposite extreme, Niger is now the only country in the world to have more 0-15 year olds than 15-65 year olds. 
This chart shows both Old Age Dependency (y-axis) and Youth Dependency (x-axis). In a sense, it shows that the youngest countries, like Niger, are about twice as young as the oldest countries, like Japan, are old.
Among rich countries, two of the biggest outliers are Japan and Israel. Both have similar total dependency ratios (0.69 for Japan, 0.67 for Israel), but in Japan seniors outnumber children by roughly 2 to 1, whereas in Israel the reverse is true

Here’s another view of the same chart, except with most of the minor countries removed in order to get a less cluttered view of the major countries:

If we look at Europe as a whole, including countries in its surrounding region, we can see there is a divergence occurring between northern and southern countries. Northern countries such as Germany, Russia, and Poland*, which have had some of the lowest dependency burdens in the world in recent decades, may see sharp increases in the years ahead because their largest population cohorts are approaching 65 years old and they have few teenagers approaching 15 years old. (An exception to this is Ireland, where the largest age cohort is 35-40 years old. Irish birth rates were relatively high until the 1990s).

Mediterranean countries, in contrast, may have their dependency ratios rise more slowly, either because they have more children or because (particularly in Spain) their largest age cohorts are now only in their forties rather than their fifties. Within the EU this is especially true of France, which has had high birth rates by European standards. It is, however, even more true of non-EU Mediterranean countries, such as Turkey or the Arab and Berber states of North Africa. These countries used to have far higher ratios than the EU or Russia, but no longer do today:
Picture10

This fall in dependency in places like Turkey and North Africa is part of a greater trend, in which countries in the “global south”, particularly those outside of Sub-Saharan Africa, have recently seen their ratios fall much more quickly than countries in Europe, North America, or Northeast Asia. India’s dependency ratio, for example, fell below both the US’s and Germany’s in 2016. So did Bangladesh’s. (Pakistan’s ratio is falling too, but still remains high, around the level of Japan’s). Latin America’s is even lower; it recently became the lowest of any major region other than East Asia.

The big country that has had the most significant fall in dependency, however, is Iran:

Picture11.png
Source: the World Bank; Iran’s fall in fertility in the 1980s and 1990s (during or immediately following the Iran-Iraq War) was quicker even than China’s in the 1960s and 1970s (during or immediately following the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution) or South Korea’s from 1960-1978 (during the 18-year rule of military dictator-turned-president Park Chung-hee)

Of course, age dependency ratios are simplistic. They treat all people above the age of 65 and below the age of 15 as if they were the same, and all people between 15 and 65 years old as if they were the same. Yet if (for example) we were to change the upper limit of working age from 65 to 75, Japan’s dependency ratio would fall substantially as a result, because Japan’s largest age cohort today is 65-75 years old. (Many of these Japanese senior citizens are still in the workforce). If, on the other hand, we were to change the lower limit of working age from 15 to 25, many lower-income countries’ ratios would rise substantially.

In a country like the Philippines, close to 30 percent of the working-age population is between 15-25 years old; in countries like China and Japan closer to 15 percent of the working-age population is between 15-25 years old

A primary lesson that can be learned from the analysis of age dependency ratios is that the common “young population good, old population bad” view of countries’ economic prospects is a misleading one. In reality countries with young populations tend to remain poor, in part because the youngest countries in the world (in Sub-Saharan Africa) are much younger than the oldest countries in the world are old. It will probably still be a number of decades before aging populations lead Europe or North America to have a higher age dependency ratio than Sub-Saharan Africa. And even that assumes that no unexpected shifts in migration or fertility will occur.

What age dependency ratios do show is two big trends, both of which have to do with middle-income economies. The first trend is the emergence of what we might call a goldilocks belt, located between the aging populations of North America, Europe, and Northeast Asia on the one hand and the youthful populations of Sub-Saharan Africa on the other. Most of the countries in South Asia, North Africa, and Latin America appear to be in the process of supplanting high-income countries in terms of having the demographic trends that might be most conducive to (or at least, indicative of) economic growth.

The second trend is that Northeast Asia’s dependency ratio, which has been the lowest in the world for a generation and probably played a significant role in helping the region emerge from a low-income to middle-income level, bottomed out almost a decade ago and will soon be rising quickly. South Korea in particular is expected to have the biggest increase in its dependency burden of any major economy during the years and decades ahead, unless it experiences an inrush of adults from abroad (from North Korea, perhaps). China may not be far behind either. And Japan, where today the two biggest age cohorts are between 65-75 years old and 45-55 years old, might become, 10-15 years from now, the first wealthy country to have a higher dependency ratio than Sub-Saharan Africa.



Notes:

*The war in Ukraine may further impact these numbers, as working-age populations in the region migrate or suffer injuries and deaths. In certain countries, such as Poland, the war has however led to an increase in the working-age population, as Ukrainians have moved in. There has also lately been an increase in the number of working-age Poles returning home from Britain. (If Eastern Europeans in Britain were to return to their home countries in large numbers, it could impact the dependency ratios of several economies, in particular that of Lithuania).

Economies like South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore are projected to have the biggest increase in their dependency ratios during roughly the next 15 years (x-axis) and 30 years (y-axis). This increase, at over 60% and 120%, respectively, is much bigger even than the 20-40% decrease in dependency that the countries on the opposite extreme, like Zimbabwe, are projected by the World Bank to experience during this same span
Picture7
South Korea (that is, the Republic of Korea) has the lowest fertility rate (1.05) and lowest dependency ratio of any major economy. North Korea (the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) has a fertility rate (1.9) and dependency ratio that are higher (assuming you trust North Korean statistics on these issues), but are still low by global standards. In both countries, the largest population cohort today is between about 50-55 years old. But in the South the national median age is approximately 43.2 years old, whereas in the North the median age is 34.6 years old


In the past two decades, countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have seen the biggest increase in their 15-25 year old populations, even as their dependency ratios remain the highest in the world because their 0-15 year old populations remain so large. (The two biggest increases in 15-25 year olds since 2000 were Niger and Qatar; oddly enough, Niger has the world’s highest dependency ratio and Qatar the world’s lowest). Countries in East Asia and Europe (especially eastern Europe), and also Iran, have seen the biggest decrease in their 15-25 year old population in the past two decades.

Average Income (y-axis) and Dependency Ratio (x-axis), for selected countries

Country Reports: Modi’s in Lucknow

India’s GDP grew by an estimated 3.7 percent in 2019, by far its slowest rate since 2008. It was thought at the time that Narendra Modi might lose his majority government, and perhaps even his position as prime minister, in the elections held in India that spring. Instead, Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) increased the size of its majority, winning 56 percent of seats in the lower house of India’s parliamentand winning 65 percent of the seats when combined with a number of BJP-allied regional parties, such as the Shiv Sena (“Army of Shiva”) party in India’s second largest state, Maharashtra.

BJP’s rival the Congress Party, which had held the office of prime minister in 55 out of India’s 67 years of political independence prior to Modi’s being elected in 2014, won just 9.6 percent of the country’s parliamentary seats. Congress’ alliance won 17 percent of the seats, mainly thanks to the southern state Tamil Nadu, where a Congress-allied regional party won 38 of the state’s 39 allotted seats (though it only received 52% of the votes cast in the state). 

Modi’s BJP was thus able to be re-elected with a majority government for the first time in its history. The only politicians who had ever previously been re-elected with a majority were India’s founding prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Nehru’s daughter Indira Gandhi. Until Modi, no prime minister had been able to form even a single majority government since 1989, when Indira’s son Rajiv left office. By defeating Indira’s grandson Rahul in 2014 and 2019, Modi has now joined this illustrious list.

ndia Mpa.png


Figure 1– As in the previous election in 2014, the BJP and its alliance dominated the northern and western regions of India, leaving Congress’ alliance, along with several parties unaffiliated with either Congress or the BJP, to split the smaller south and east. In the electoral maps above you can see the BJP and its alliance in orange and the Congress and its alliance in light blue.


A Quick Analysis of Modi’s Career

Modi’s political career, first as Chief Minister of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014 and then as Prime Minister of India since 2014, has been based on two pillars:

  1. Economic Ability
    • Gujarat was often the most dynamic economy in India while Modi was leading it
    • India, despite slowing along with much of the world economy, has maintained a decent economic performance since 2014, and recently overtook China’s growth rate
  2. Hindu Nationalism
            Arguably, some of the most extreme examples of this include:

These two aspects of Modi’s appeal have contributed to his political success in northern India in particular, where Hindi(-Urdu) is spoken relatively widely and where, especially in inland states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, most of India’s poorest populations live. Modi himself represents the constituency of Varanasi, in Uttar Pradesh. 20 percent of BJP seats are from that state, more than twice as many as the BJP won in any other.

prov
With more than 200 million people, Uttar Pradesh is by far the most populous state not just in India, but anywhere in the world. It has a larger Hindu population than any other state in India, and it has a larger Muslim population than (for example) any Arab country apart from Egypt. Uttar Pradesh’s rural population is larger than that of any other country in the world apart from China. And its neighbours too are populous: Uttar Pradesh directly borders India’s third and fifth most populous states, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh. It also directly borders India’s capital city-state, Delhi. 10 of India’s 14 prime ministers since independence have represented constituencies in Uttar Pradesh.

Modi, in addition to being the member of parliament for the holy city Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh, has had his political career intertwine with this state in other significant ways. Notably, by way of the 2002 Gujarat Riots’ direct connection to the Ayodhya Mosque/Temple Dispute (a long, complex story that is analogous to, though in many ways different from and even more tragic than, the Middle East’s dispute over Jerusalem’s holy sites), and the continuing involvement in that dispute by BJP leaders such as Modi’s designated Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath, as well as by Modi himself

The BJP’s rival, the Congress Party, also has roots in Uttar Pradesh. Its city of Allahabad* was the home of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty (unrelated to the Gandhi), a family that has supplied four generations of Congress’ top leaders – three of them Prime Ministers. The current scion of the family, Rahul Gandhi, is however an MP for a constituency in Kerala, in India’s far south. Rahul also contested, but lost, his family’s historic seat in Amethi, Uttar Pradesh, where he was previously the MP for fifteen years, from 2004 to 2019. Rahul’s only sibling, Priyanka, who formally entered politics in 2019, is serving as the Congress party’s leader in charge of Uttar Pradesh, with an election in the state coming up in February 2022. Their mother, Sonia Gandhi, who is currently president of the Congress party, is an MP who has her constituency in Lucknow, the capital city of Uttar Pradesh

This has led to an obvious, arguably misleading debate in Western media, over whether Modi’s economic pros justify his political cons. This might or might not be a legitimate debate, but it also overlooks one of the key realities of Modi’s career: the fact that much, maybe most, of his economic success has been due to factors beyond his control. Modi has been extremely lucky in relation to factors such as global economic growth, oil and gas prices, and the utterly different economic characteristics of Gujarat (the state where Modi rose to fame) compared to India as a whole.

Gujarat, 2001 to 2014

Modi was Chief Minister of the state Gujarat from October 2001 (eight months after the Gujarat Earthquake) until May 2014, when he became India’s prime minister. Two facts must be recognized to put Modi’s time in Gujarat into context: the exceptional status of Gujarat, and the exceptional nature of the period from 2001-2014.

The period from 2001 to 2014 was the 2000s commodity boom, the period that followed the early 2000s recession when, apart from a sharp dip during the 2008-2009 recession, energy and other commodity prices were high and global economic growth was significant, particularly in China and other developing markets but also in North America and (before the 2010s) Europe.  Brent crude oil, for example, rose from all-time lows of $9 in 1998 to $144 in 2008 and $128 in 2012. Modi came into office in Gujarat when oil prices were $20, exited office with oil at $110, then watched from his new Prime Minister’s office in New Delhi as oil prices fell to $46 in the subsequent seven months. Prices remained low for the next eight years, until 2022.

India states.png

The characteristics of Gujarat’s economy are similarly exceptional. Together with its next-door neighbour Mumbai (the megacity of Maharashtra, where about 20 percent of the city’s population speaks Gujarati as a first language), the state of Gujarat is India’s leading commercial hub. Gujarat accounts for an estimated 69 percent of all cargo volume handled at India’s private ports, as well as being home to India’s busiest publicly-owned port, a remarkable feat considering that the state’s 60 million inhabitants are only 5 percent of India’s total population.

Just as remarkable is the Gujarati diaspora, which leads in commercial activity throughout much of the Indian Ocean, particularly in eastern Africa.(The most famous Gujarati abroad was, of course, Mohandas Gandhi, who lived in South Africa for more than two decades. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founding leader of Pakistan, was also a native Gujarati speaker, born in Karachi, who was trained as a barrister in England). The diaspora thrives as far away as the US, where 20 percent or so of US-Indians are Gujaratis, and are one of America’s most successful groups.

The Gujarati diaspora has historically also been prominent in the nearby Gulf region of the Middle East. It remains active in the Gulf today, particularly in Oman. Gujarat itself, moreover, holds the most prominent position in India’s oil and gas industries, in terms of oil production, oil refining, oil pipelines, gas pipelines, LNG regasification, and petrochemicals.

Guj oil

As such, the commodity boom and global economic growth both helped Gujarat remain the fastest-growing Indian economy in the 2000s (apart from the relatively small Himalayan states Uttarakhand and Sikkim).


India, 2014 to 2019

India’s economy is the opposite of Gujarat’s. It is relatively insular rather than dependent on global economic activity, the major exception to this being the large amount of oil it imports, more than any country apart from the US or China. Global economic conditions since Modi became prime minister are unlike those which existed prior to 2015, however. Oil prices have fallen to a range of $30-$70, benefiting India. Global and developing markets have slowed, which has hurt India but not nearly as much as it has hurt most other economies, in particular commodity exporters like Brazil or Russia.

There is even a possibility that India’s slowing economy has helped Modi. It may be that the slowing was not severe enough to undercut Modi’s reputation as a great economic steward, yet  was significant enough for people to want a great economic steward – Modi – to remain in charge in order to deal with it. In other words, the lucky timing that helped Modi to build up his economic reputation in Gujarat, combined with the fact that India’s recent economic slowdown has not been as severe as many other countries’, may have helped lead to Modi’s political victory in 2019.

Indian politics obviously cannot be understood just by looking at changes in energy or other commodity prices. There is lot going on in the country: the growth of urban populations, the fall in fertility rates, the spread of phones and highways and other technologies and infrastructure, the complicated politics of linguistic, caste, ethnic, and religious divisions, and much more. Modi is playing a major role in all these areas, both driving and being driven by changes taking place in the country.

This is often pointed out. But you rarely hear Modi’s success being attributed to the coincidental timing of his years as Chief Minister of Gujarat and then Prime Minister of India with changes in global commerce and commodity markets, and the relevance of those changes given the differing characteristics of the Gujarati and Indian economies. Yet those economic factors might have been decisive. Politicians, no matter how praiseworthy or skilled, often do not control their own fortunes. Modi remains in luck now. More troublingly, perhaps, so does Yogi Adityanath.

Modi

Notes:

  • Modi’s initial political emergence in the 1990s might also be partially explainable by external economic factors. In 1998 oil prices fell to their modern-day lows during the Asian financial crisis, which began in the summer of 1997. India’s economic growth slowed at the end of 1997 as a result of the financial crisis, and in India’s elections in 1998 Atal Bihari Vajpayee (the MP for Lucknow) became in effect the BJP’s first ever prime minister, serving from 1998 until 2004. (He had previously been prime minister in 1996, but that government only lasted for a few weeks). In Gujarat, the BJP had formed its first government in 1995, but it only lasted for seven months. The financial crises in 1997 paved the way for BJP’s return in Gujarat in the 1998 elections. Modi, receiving credit for the Gujarat win, was then promoted to General Secretary of the BJP.
  • After the Gujarat earthquake in 2001, the BJP’s Chief Minister of Gujarat, who was in his seventies and supposedly in ill health, was replaced by Modi. Modi was sworn in on October 7, 2001, coincidentally the same day that the US invaded Afghanistan after 9-11, and also the same week that three suicide truck bombers had attacked the Jammu and Kashmir parliament. (Two months later, India’s national parliament in Delhi was attacked by five militants, leading to a small war between India and Pakistan. This took place a few years after Pakistan’s first, and India’s second, nuclear bomb tests in 1998). After being re-elected Prime Minister in 2019, Modi’s government split Jammu and Kashmir into two entities, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, exerting more of Delhi’s political authority over that region
  • Because of its high domestic coal production and low per capita energy consumption, India only relies on fossil fuel imports for approximately one-third of its overall energy consumption. That is about middle-of-the-pack for large economies; far less than in import-dependent countries like Japan, South Korea, Germany, or Italy, but still significantly more than countries like the US, China, Brazil, or Argentina. By contrast, India relies on imports of oil for approximately eighty-eight percent of its oil consumption. Other than China, India is by far the largest net importer of oil in the world. Yet India is also more dependent on oil imports than China is. China domestically produces six or seven times more oil than India does, so it relies on oil imports for a smaller share – about seventy percent – of its total oil consumption
  • Coal, which accounts for nearly three-quarters of India’s electricity generation, is mainly mined in northern and eastern states (though not in the states to the north or east of Bangladesh). Approximately seventy percent of India’s coal reserves are located in just four adjacent states: Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, and West Bengal. India is the largest coal producer in the world apart from China, yet still imports more than a quarter of the coal it consumes, making it the largest coal importer in the world apart from Japan
  • Allahabad was recently renamed Prayagraj by Yogi Adityanath’s government, since “city of Allah” was deemed too Muslim a name, despite the city having been founded by the religiously syncretic emperor Akbar. (Similarly, in 2017 Yogi’s government even left the Taj Mahal, in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, off of the state’s tourism brochure, since the Taj Mahal was commissioned by Akbar’s grandson Shah Jahan, who unlike his grandfather was perhaps more of an orthodox Muslim as emperor. You know you’ve got an extremist movement in government when the Taj Mahal is being taken out of official tourist brochures).
  • Modi and Yogi’s BJP ended up winning a majority in Uttar Pradesh’s 2022 state election, becoming the first party since 1985 to lead two consecutive majority governments there.
  • Uttar Pradesh became the world’s largest sub-national population around 1960, overtaking Sichuan, which at the time was China’s largest province, with about 70 million people. Uttar Pradesh’s population has grown enormously since then, to approximately 233 million. This growth occurred even though it lost 5 percent of its population when its Himalayan region Uttarakhand broke off from Uttar Pradesh to become a state of its own in 2000.
  • Even though Uttar Pradesh’s birth rate has been falling rapidly – it is now just 2.4 children per mother, still the third highest in India but well behind its populous neighbour Bihar, which has 3 children per mother – it nevertheless added about 30 million new inhabitants during the past decade. It did this despite the fact that neighbouring Delhi added 13 million people in the past decade, pulling in millions of rural migrants from Uttar Pradesh
  • Uttar Pradesh has the most imbalanced sex ratio of any major province in India apart from Punjab. As of 2011 it had approximately 9.1 women for every 10 men. This is quite a bit more imbalanced even than China (assuming China’s statistics can be trusted), or than just about any other country in the world with the exception of the Gulf Arab monarchies
  • From Quartz.com : “Overall, Gujarat’s gross state domestic product has grown at an average of 16.6% a year from 2001 to 2010, up from an annual average of 5.1% from 1980 to 1990 and 8.2% from 1991 to 1998, according to the Planning Commission (pdf, p.2). In the 1991 to 1998 period (before Modi took office) Gujarat was the fastest-growing of India’s 14 major states based on gross state product. From 2001 to 2010, Gujarat’s annual average state domestic product growth is bested by Uttarakhand (18%), a state created in 2000, and Sikkim (19.2%) which was not counted as a ‘major state’ in the 1991 to 1998 figures”
  • Ahead of the 2019 elections, the SP-BSP electoral alliance was formed in Uttar Pradesh between the Bahajun Samaj Party (BSP) and the Samajwadi Party (SP), parties led by two former political rivals of one another — Akhilesh Yadav and Mayawati – who, along with Akhilesh’ father and predecessor Mulayam Singh Yadav, had consecutively been Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh from 2002 until 2017 (and had also been so earlier, during much of the 1990s). The two parties put aside their long rivalry in response to the BJP sweeping Uttar Pradesh in the 2014 general election and then also winning Uttar Pradesh’s state-level elections in 2017, the first time the BJP had won a state election in Uttar Pradesh since 1996. But their new anti-BJP alliance was not enough to stop the BJP from receiving nearly 43 million votes in Uttar Pradesh in 2019, against 32 million votes in Uttar Pradesh split almost equally between the SP and BSP. As an indication of just how populous this state is, these large numbers of votes were cast despite Uttar Pradesh having the lowest voter turnout (59%) of any state in India apart from Jammu and Kashmir or Bihar
  • The SP-BSP alliance won only 3% of seats in parliament despite receiving ~38 million votes (6.2% of the country’s popular vote), the most of any party other than the BJP or Congress. 32 million of those votes came from Uttar Pradesh. This occurred to an even greater extent in the previous election: in 2014, before its alliance with the SP, the BSP received more than 20 million votes, the third most of any party in India, yet did not win even a single seat in parliament! (The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party in Tamil Nadu, in contrast, won 38 seats in this election, of the 39 available in that state, with only about 14 million votes, 52% of the total vote in Tamil Nadu).
  • The next largest party, the All India Trinamool Congress, won roughly 4% of India’s popular vote in 2019 and received 4% of the seats, all from West Bengal, India’s fourth most populous state. The All India Trinamool Congress is incorrectly included in the SP-BSP Mahagathbandhan (“Grand Alliance”) on the election results maps shown above
  • Though the BJP mainly won the north and west of the country, it also made inroads into the south and east in this past election, more so than in 2014, notably in West Bengal, Odisha, Telangana, and Karnataka
  • Indira Gandhi was unique in representing multiple constituencies during her 15-year tenure as PM (first from 1966-1977 and then from 1980 until her assassination in 1984). She first represented two different constituencies in Uttar Pradesh, but later upon returning to power in 1980 represented a constituency in Andhra Pradesh, in south-east India
  • Indira’s son, Rajiv Gandhi, was until Modi the previous prime minister able to form even a single majority government. Rajiv won a record 76% of seats in parliament in an election at the end of 1984, less than two months after Indira’s assassination. Rajiv too was assassinated, in 1991, one month before a general election. For 25 consecutive years from 1989-2014, India had only minority governments, led by several different political parties.
  • The second biggest election victory in India since Nehru came when Indira won 68% of seats in parliament in 1971, including 83% of the seats in Uttar Pradesh. That election took place a few weeks after the deadliest storm ever recorded struck India and Bangladesh, a few weeks before Bangladesh’s war of independence against Pakistan began, and a few months before India would become involved in that war on the side of Bangladesh. It was followed as well by several particularly difficult or noteworthy events in India’s history, such as the 1973-1974 oil shock (a global event which hurt India more than most other countries, given its dependence on fuel imports), India’s first successful nuclear test (Operation Smiling Buddha) in 1974, and the 1975-1977 Emergency and accompanying mass sterilization campaign, during which democratic rights were suspended.
  • In the subsequent election, in 1977, Indira lost badly to a coalition of opposition parties, leading the Congress party to lose the position of prime minister for the very first time. Congress did not win even a single seat in Uttar Pradesh in that election, including in Indira’s own constituency. Indira’s son and initial political heir, Sanjay Gandhi, who had played a leading role during the Emergency, also lost his Uttar Pradesh seat in 1977, and survived an assassination attempt that year as well. He and Indira would both make a comeback in the next election, in 1980, but he was killed in a crash while piloting an airplane later that year. Modi, meanwhile, began working for the Hindu nationalist paramilitary organization, the RSS – of which the BJP is the affiliated political party – at the national level in 1978.
  • At the end of 1978, two men hijacked a passenger airplane for several hours and demanded that Indira be released from prison – she was arrested after the Emergency – and various charges against Sanjay be dropped. The two hijackers were rewarded by the Congress party for doing this, being made parliamentary candidates in Uttar Pradesh in 1980. Both won and served multiple terms. Just a little reminder that the BJP’s ascendence is perhaps not so much the rise of political extremism in India, but rather a newly ascendent type